PEOPLE v. HARRIGAN

2017-08732. Ind. No. 2671/12.

200 A.D.3d 803 (2021)

155 N.Y.S.3d 97

2021 NY Slip Op 06863

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. William Harrigan, appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided December 8, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia Pazner , New York, NY ( Yvonne Shivers of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz , District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY ( Johnnette Traill , Ellen C. Abbot , and Charles T. Pollak of counsel), for respondent.

Chambers, J.P., Hinds-Radix, Barros and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was not deprived of a fair trial when the Supreme Court limited his attorney's comments during summation as to the law on the defense of justification. It is well established that "it is the function of the judge to instruct the jury upon the law, and where counsel undertake to read the law to the jury, the judge may properly interpose to prevent it" (Williams v Brooklyn El. R.R. Co., 126 N.Y. 96, 104 [1891...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases