Defendants' expert addressed all aspects of plaintiff's claim, opining that defendants did not deviate from good and accepted medical care in timely diagnosing plaintiff with HIT, that they correctly used her post-surgical platelet levels as a baseline, considered HIT in the differential diagnosis, and performed diagnostic tests for HIT when plaintiff's clinical presentation warranted it (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HASHEM v. OSORIO
Index No. 805073/17. Appeal No. 14798. Case No. 2020-04490.
200 A.D.3d 454 (2021)
157 N.Y.S.3d 449
2021 NY Slip Op 06801
Giuseppina Hashem, Appellant, v. James Albert Osorio, M.D., et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 7, 2021.
Decided December 7, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Zucker & Regev, P.C., Brooklyn ( Guy Regev of counsel), for appellant.
Martin Clearwater & Bell LLP, East Meadow ( Gregory A. Cascino of counsel), for respondents.
Concur—Gische, J.P., Webber, Friedman, Kennedy, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
