Contrary to plaintiff's reading of the order on appeal, the motion court did not find, as a matter of law, that plaintiff had sustained a serious injury involving a significant limitation of use to her left shoulder; rather, the motion court found only that plaintiff had raised a triable issue of fact with respect to that shoulder injury. Although plaintiff did not present evidence of permanent or significant limitations of use in her
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LAMAR-VATERPOOL v. DEVORA
200 A.D.3d 421 (2021)
154 N.Y.S.3d 765
2021 NY Slip Op 06765
Melisa Lamar-Vaterpool, Appellant, v. Juan I. Devora et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 2, 2021.
Decided December 2, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Sanders, Sanders, Block, Woycik, Viener & Grossman, P.C., Garden City ( David Matthew Kittrell of counsel), for appellant.
Baker, McEvoy & Moskovits, P.C., Brooklyn ( Marjorie E. Bornes of counsel), for respondents.
Concur—Gische, J.P., Kapnick, Kern, Gesmer, Kennedy, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.