DHCR's determination that a rent reduction is warranted was rationally based and supported by the record (see CPLR 7803[3]). DHCR's on-site inspection revealed that 20 required services were not maintained in the apartment of petitioner's tenant. DHCR has broad discretion in ascertaining whether a required service is not being properly provided (see Matter of Melohn v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF 113-117 REALTY, LLC v. DIVISION OF HOUS. & COMMUNITY RENEWAL
150738/20. Appeal No. 14650. Case No. 2021-01244.
199 A.D.3d 506 (2021)
154 N.Y.S.3d 428
2021 NY Slip Op 06432
In the Matter of 113-117 Realty, LLC, Appellant, v. Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent, et al., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided November 18, 2021.
Decided November 18, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Golino Law Group, PLLC, New York ( Santo Golino of counsel), for appellant.
Mark F. Palomino , New York ( Martin B. Schneider of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Kapnick, J.P., Webber, Oing, Moulton, Rodriguez, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
