The determination denying petitioner's application for a variance was not arbitrary and capricious. Respondents had a rational basis for finding that petitioner's application, to legalize a nonconforming advertising sign, contained inconsistent and confusing factual claims concerning the location of the sign. Petitioner's attempt to obfuscate a fact harmful to their application caused the Department of Buildings to erroneously issue a permit that was later revoked. Thus,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.