VELASQUEZ v. NEW YORK CITY TR. AUTH./MTA

Index No. 34052/19E. M-3153 Appeal No. 14438. Case No. 2021-01998.

198 A.D.3d 555 (2021)

152 N.Y.S.3d 823

2021 NY Slip Op 05803

Carlos Velasquez, Appellant, v. New York City Transit Authority/MTA, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 21, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Law Offices of Brad A. Kauffman, PLLC, New York ( Brad A. Kauffman of counsel), for appellant.

Anna J. Ervolina , Brooklyn ( Timothy J. O'Shaughnessy of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Manzanet-Daniels, Kern, Oing, Kennedy, JJ.


Defendant satisfied the requirements of CPLR 3012(d), which authorizes an extension of time to appear and plead "upon such terms as may be just and upon a showing of reasonable excuse for delay or default." Here, delay in filing an answer was occasioned by law office failure, which constitutes "good cause" for the delay (see Lamar v City of New York, 68 A.D.3d 449 [1st Dept 2009]). Notably...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases