The court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff's motion for leave to renew and reargue and, upon renewal and reargument, granting the motion to compel production of the documents at issue without first requiring an in camera review (cf. K.V. v New York City Hous. Auth., 180 A.D.3d 533 [1st Dept 2020]; Luna v Brodcom W. Dev. Co. LLC, 177 A.D.3d 516 [1st Dept 2019]). In its order granting renewal and reargument, the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ZHANG v. CITY OF NEW YORK
198 A.D.3d 504 (2021)
152 N.Y.S.3d 591
2021 NY Slip Op 05659
Junmei Zhang, Respondent, v. City of New York et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided October 14, 2021.
Decided October 14, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Harris Beach PLLC, New York ( Andrew J. Orenstein of counsel), for appellants.
Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco, LLP, Garden City ( Carolyn M. Canzoneri of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Gische, J.P., Moulton, González, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.