The court correctly denied defendants' motion for partial summary judgment regarding the fraud claim on the grounds that it had denied a prior summary judgment motion by defendants which made the same arguments. Defendants did not submit any new factual assertions or evidence that were unavailable to defendants before the prior motion, and they failed to show sufficient cause for making the second motion (see Jones v 636 Holding Corp.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.