Although it was not signed, the transcript of the deposition testimony of one of Sterling's partners was admissible in support of Sterling's motion, because it was submitted by Sterling (see Singh v New York City Hous. Auth., 177 A.D.3d 475, 475 [1st Dept 2019]). Moreover, the transcript was certified by a court reporter, and plaintiff did not challenge its accuracy (see id.).
The undisputed deposition testimony shows that Sterling was merely a shareholder...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.