Kalam Id-Din argues correctly that the default judgment should be vacated as against him because plaintiff failed to show that he complied with CPLR 3215(g)(3)(i). Plaintiff mailed the summons to Kalam Id-Din's places of business, not his place of residence, and he failed to state that Kalam Id-Din's place of residence was unknown. Contrary to plaintiff's contention, since CPLR 3215(g)(3) is meant to protect defendants, the burden should be on plaintiff to show that he did...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
