1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 198 A.D.3d
  5. 198 A.D.3d 434 (2021)
 

MATTER OF STENGEL v. VANCE

Index Nos. 161417/19, 159401/19. Appeal No. 1428114282. Case Nos. 2020-02617, 2020-02614.

198 A.D.3d 434 (2021)

152 N.Y.S.3d 306

2021 NY Slip Op 05313

In the Matter of Andrew M. Stengel, Appellant, v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Andrew M. Stengel, Appellant, v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 5, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bell Law PLLC, New York ( Henry Bell of counsel) for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. , District Attorney, New York ( Madeleine Guilmain and Stephen J. Kress of counsel) for respondents.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ.

In both proceedings, the court properly found that the records sought were attorney work product, which is specifically protected from disclosure by CPLR 3101(c) (see Matter of Stengel v Vance, 192 A.D.3d 571, 571 [1st Dept 2021]). The records "cannot be redacted pursuant to FOIL, which permits redactions of records only under the personal privacy exemption" (id.).

Petitioner is not entitled to attorneys'...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases