1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 198 A.D.3d
  5. 198 A.D.3d 405 (2021)
 

MATTER OF FRANCISCO A. v. AMARILIS V.

Docket Nos. V-38601/19, V-38602/19, O-38605/19. Appeal No. 14260-14260A. Case No. 2021-01018.

198 A.D.3d 405 (2021)

156 N.Y.S.3d 5

2021 NY Slip Op 05281

In the Matter of Francisco A., Respondent, v. Amarilis V., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided October 5, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce A. Young , Brooklyn, for appellant.

Geoffrey P. Berman , Larchmont, for respondent.

Kenneth M. Tuccillo , Hastings on Hudson, attorney for the children.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ.

Respondent is correct that, even if the order of protection has expired, the appeal is not moot, given the order's "enduring consequences" (Matter of Veronica P. v Radcliff A., 24 N.Y.3d 668, 671 [2015]).

Nevertheless, respondent failed to demonstrate that either the order of protection or the custody order should be disturbed. Contrary to her argument, she was not deprived of a full and fair hearing. Her contentions that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases