SAHMANOVIC v. KINGSBRIDGE REALTY ASSOC., LLC

305450/08, 83919/09. Appeal No. 14256. Case No. 2021-01177.

197 A.D.3d 1077 (2021)

152 N.Y.S.3d 688

2021 NY Slip Op 05181

Igbala Sahmanovic et al., Respondents, v. Kingsbridge Realty Associates, LLC, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided September 30, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosenbaum & Taylor, P.C., White Plains ( Leslie Luke of counsel), for appellant.

Bongiorno, Montiglio, Mitchell & Palmieri, PLLC, Mineola ( Angelo J. Bongiorno of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Oing, Rodriguez, Higgitt, JJ.


While it is true that on a motion for leave to amend the complaint the movants "need not establish the merit of [their] proposed new allegations," they must "show that the proffered amendment is not palpably insufficient or clearly devoid of merit" (Perrotti v Becker, Glynn, Melamed & Muffly LLP, 82 A.D.3d 495, 498 [1st Dept 2011]).

Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the complaint should have been denied because they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases