KHAN v. KHAN

2018-07444. Index No. 454/15.

197 A.D.3d 1164 (2021)

151 N.Y.S.3d 371

2021 NY Slip Op 04969

Nazia Khan, Appellant, v. Zafar Khan, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided September 15, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Krentsel & Guzman, LLP (Michael H. Zhu, Esq., P.C., New York, NY, of counsel), for appellant.

Fishman & Tynan, Merrick, NY ( John Fishman of counsel), for respondent.

Austin, J.P., Hinds-Radix, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the appeal from the order entered April 10, 2018, is dismissed, with costs.

"The method of service provided for in an order to show cause is jurisdictional in nature and must be strictly complied with" (U.S. Bank N.A. v Feliciano, 103 A.D.3d 791, 791 [2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see City of New York v Miller, 72 A.D.3d 726, 727 [2010]). Here, the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases