Contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. CANTY
2019-05254. Ind. No. 1333/18.
195 A.D.3d 746 (2021)
144 N.Y.S.3d 873
2021 NY Slip Op 03606
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy Canty, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 9, 2021.
Decided June 9, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Janet E. Sabel , New York, NY ( Desiree Sheridan of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez , District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY ( Leonard Joblove and Amy Appelbaum of counsel; Alastair Allen on the memorandum), for respondent.
Rivera, J.P., Hinds-Radix, Connolly and Iannacci, JJ., concur.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
