FRIEDRICH v. KLARISTENFELD

2019-04459. Index No. 523653/18.

195 A.D.3d 597 (2021)

144 N.Y.S.3d 635

2021 NY Slip Op 03443

Sarah Friedrich, Respondent, v. Rifka Klaristenfeld, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 2, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander M. Dudelson , Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.

Storch Law, P.C., Brooklyn, NY ( Zvi A. Storch of counsel), for respondent.

Hinds-Radix, J.P., Connolly, Iannacci and Christopher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff and the defendant are sisters. On November 25, 2010, their parents, as grantors, and the defendant, as trustee, established an inter vivos trust of which the plaintiff is a remainderman (hereinafter the Trust).

In 2018, the plaintiff, in her capacity as a remainderman under the Trust, commenced this action against the defendant, individually and in her capacity as trustee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases