Espinal's opposition to the summary judgment motion was timely filed in accordance with CPLR 2214(b). Since the motion court granted plaintiff's motion on the ground that Espinal failed to submit opposition papers, and therefore did not reach the merits of the motion, the matter is remanded for the motion court to consider the merits of the summary judgment motion in the first instance (see Fomina v DUB Realty, LLC,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
AMERICAN TR. INS. CO. v. ESPINAL
195 A.D.3d 401 (2021)
144 N.Y.S.3d 586
2021 NY Slip Op 03399
American Transit Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Samuel O. Espinal, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 1, 2021.
Decided June 1, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Law Office of Daniel J. Tucker, Brooklyn ( Ethan A. Rothschild of counsel), for respondent.
Concur— Gische, J.P., Webber, Singh, Kennedy, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.