PEOPLE v. DORCIL

2018-07616. Ind. No. 8833/15.

194 A.D.3d 1069 (2021)

144 N.Y.S.3d 394

2021 NY Slip Op 03328

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Patrice Dorcil, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided May 26, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven A. Feldman , Manhasset, NY ( Arza Feldman of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez , District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY ( Leonard Joblove , Jodi L. Mandel , and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.

Chambers, J.P., Duffy, Iannacci and Wooten, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant's contention that a lineup procedure which resulted in his identification as the perpetrator was unduly suggestive due to a discrepancy between his age and the ages of the other participants. The photographs taken of the lineup reflect that the age disparities between the defendant and the fillers were not so apparent as to "orient the viewer toward the defendant as a perpetrator of the crimes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases