1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 194 A.D.3d
  5. 194 A.D.3d 588 (2021)
 

STEINBERG v. STEINBERG

Index No. 305617/18. Appeal No. 13873. Case No. 2020-02954.

194 A.D.3d 588 (2021)

2021 NY Slip Op 03272

Steinberg, Respondent, v. Steinberg, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 20, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottensreich LLP, New York ( Jad Greifer of counsel), for appellant.

Aaronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP, New York ( David Aronson of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Webber, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ.

The motion court correctly determined that defendant failed to show exigent circumstances that would warrant disturbing the pendente lite award (see Torres v Torres, 171 A.D.3d 613 [1st Dept 2019]). Defendant made no showing that he is unable to meet his financial obligations. As noted by the motion court, defendant has substantial liquid assets under his control and the proven ability to earn significant income. Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases