1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 194 A.D.3d
  5. 194 A.D.3d 585 (2021)
 

RINGEL v. ROGOSNITZKY

Index No. 311906/07. Appeal No. 13880N. Case No. 2020-04940.

194 A.D.3d 585 (2021)

144 N.Y.S.3d 338

2021 NY Slip Op 03268

Chana Ringel, Respondent, v. Binyomin Rogosnitzky, Also Known as Benny Rogosnitzky, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 20, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Douglas Barics , Commack, for appellant.

Koffsky Schwalb LLC, New York ( Efrem Schwalb of counsel), for respondent.

Concur— Acosta, P.J., Kapnick, Webber, Kennedy, JJ.

The court was not required to hold a full evidentiary hearing before deciding defendant's motion (see Matter of Antoine D. v Kyla Monique P., 168 A.D.3d 476 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 32 N.Y.3d 917 [2019]). The court acquired sufficient information to render an informed decision about the children's best interests during the multiple appearances on the motion, and defendant made no showing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases