1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 194 A.D.3d
  5. 194 A.D.3d 555 (2021)
 

RAZZAK v. JUNO, INC.

Index No. 656428/19. Appeal No. 13853. Case No. 2019-01640.

194 A.D.3d 555 (2021)

143 N.Y.S.3d 878

2021 NY Slip Op 03153

Mohammed Razzak et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Juno, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 18, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Mohammed Gangat, New York ( Mohammed Gangat of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

Akerman LLP, New York ( Jeffrey A. Kimmel of counsel), for respondents-appellants.

Concur—Kern, J.P., Oing, Singh, Moulton, JJ.

The court correctly dismissed the fraudulent inducement cause of action, as the allegations of damages from the fraud are too conclusory to sustain the claim. The court also correctly dismissed the cause of action for false advertising/deceptive business practices directed at drivers, as it includes only conclusory allegations of actual damages and injury, in amounts yet to be determined, caused by defendants' purported deceptive acts and practices (see Smith v Chase Manhattan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases