ROWBOTHAM v. WACHENFELD

Index No. 152281/18. Appeal No. 13841. Case No. 2020-04992.

194 A.D.3d 528 (2021)

143 N.Y.S.3d 870

2021 NY Slip Op 03125

Jim Rowbotham, Appellant, v. Jeff Wachenfeld, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 13, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Steven Beispel, New York ( Steven Beispel of counsel), for appellant.

Lewis John Avallone Aviles LLP, New York ( Kevin D. Clinton of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ.


The Facebook post, "Jim is a crook. Worst Company to do business with," is an expression of opinion and therefore not actionable (see e.g. Schwartz v Nordstrom, Inc., 160 A.D.2d 240, 241 [1st Dept 1990], lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 711 [1990]; Cardali v Slater, 167 A.D.3d 476 [1st Dept 2018], lv denied 33 N.Y.3d 901 [2019]; Galasso v Saltzman, 42 A.D.3d 310...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases