The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress drugs recovered from defendant at the time of his arrest. Defendant does not dispute that, at the inception, the officers possessed an objective, credible reason for approaching him. Accordingly, escorting defendant off the elevator and into the hallway so they could talk to him was justified (see e.g. People v Francois,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HILL
194 A.D.3d 528 (2021)
143 N.Y.S.3d 871
2021 NY Slip Op 03124
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevion Hill, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 13, 2021.
Decided May 13, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Caprice R. Jenerson , Office of the Appellate Defender, New York ( Kami Lizarraga of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. , District Attorney, New York ( John T. Hughes , of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.