The court should have suppressed an eyewitness's identification of defendant from a surveillance tape. This identification was unduly suggestive, because a detective directed the eyewitness to watch for someone wearing "all brown" in the video, thus impermissibly singling out defendant (see generally People v Edmonson,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.