Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, under the circumstances of this case, including the seriousness of the crime and the defendant's subsequent arrests, the denial of youthful offender treatment was a provident exercise of the Supreme Court's discretion (see People v Sutton, 184 A.D.3d 236, 246 [2020]; People v Booker,
The sentence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.