Even construing the complaint, as amplified by all submissions on the dismissal motion, liberally and affording it the benefit of every favorable inference (see Smith v City of New York, 170 A.D.3d 499 [1st Dept 2019]), plaintiff has failed to state a claim against the City for Monell liability (see Monell v New York City Dept. of Social Servs.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SIFONTE v. CITY OF NEW YORK
194 A.D.3d 435 (2021)
143 N.Y.S.3d 212
2021 NY Slip Op 02771
Kammie Sifonte, Appellant, v. City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 4, 2021.
Decided May 4, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
James E. Johnson , Corporation Counsel, New York ( Jamison Davies of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Acosta, P.J., Manzanet-Daniels, Moulton, Scarpulla, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.