LIU v. TIEDEMANN

Index No. 655147/20. Appeal No. 13742N. Case No. 2021-00030.

194 A.D.3d 416 (2021)

143 N.Y.S.3d 216

2021 NY Slip Op 02750

Yi Liu et al., Respondents, v. Michael Tiedemann et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 4, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pryor Cashman LLP, New York ( Eric M. Fishman of counsel), for appellants.

Kagen Caspersen & Bogart PLLC, New York ( Joel M. Taylor of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Gische, J.P., Mazzarelli, Oing, González, JJ.


Plaintiffs are correct that the choice of law provision in the parties' agreements requires the application of Delaware law (Henry Schein, Inc. v Archer & White Sales, Inc., 586 US ___, ___, 139 S.Ct. 524, 529 [2019]).

Under Delaware law, the agreements, which contain a broad arbitration clause and incorporate the rules of JAMS (which provide for arbitrability to be decided by the arbitrator), mandate referral of the issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases