The record does not provide a sound basis for the grant of sole decision-making authority over the child's medical and dental care to the father. In light of the child's substantial and continuing behavioral issues in school and the resulting overlap between educational and medical issues, it makes better sense to have the mother in charge of both areas (see Rubin v Della
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF SCOTT W. v. KRIZZIA G.
194 A.D.3d 406 (2021)
143 N.Y.S.3d 202
2021 NY Slip Op 02741
In the Matter of Scott W., Appellant, v. Krizzia G., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 4, 2021.
Decided May 4, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Law Office of Lewis S. Calderon, Jamaica ( Lewis S. Calderon of counsel), for appellant.
Steven P. Forbes , Huntington, for respondent.
Karen Freedman , Lawyers for Children, Inc., New York ( Shirim Nothenberg of counsel), attorney for the child.
Concur—Acosta, P.J., Manzanet-Daniels, Moulton, Scarpulla, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.