It is undisputed that plaintiffs failed to file or serve a timely notice of claim with defendant DOE pursuant to Education Law § 3813(1). Thus, their claims of discrimination against the DOE were properly dismissed (see Laboy v City of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RODRIGUEZ v. CITY OF NEW YORK
193 A.D.3d 603 (2021)
142 N.Y.S.3d 800
2021 NY Slip Op 02477
Hector Rodriguez et al. Appellants, v. City of New York et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 22, 2021.
Decided April 22, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Akin Law Group PLLC, New York ( Leopold Raic and Robert D. Salaman of counsel), for appellants.
James E. Johnson , Corporation Counsel, New York ( Claibourne Henry of counsel), for respondents.
Concur—Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Singh, Moulton, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.