LIDDLE & ROBINSON, L.L.P. v. WILLMAN

Index No. 654268/18. Appeal No. 13524N. Case No. 2020-01866.

193 A.D.3d 549 (2021)

142 N.Y.S.3d 355

2021 NY Slip Op 02364

Liddle & Robinson, L.L.P., Appellant, v. Barry Willman, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 20, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP, New York ( Michael M. Munoz of counsel), for appellant.

Barry Willman, respondent pro se.

Concur—Webber, J.P., Kern, Oing, González, JJ.


Because plaintiff failed to oppose the motion for reargument, it effectively is not "aggrieved" by the resulting order, and thus is not permitted to appeal from it (Leader v Parkside Group, 159 A.D.3d 523 [1st Dept 2018]; CPLR 5511).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments about appealability, including the arguments that it is plaintiff's bankruptcy trustee that is "aggrieved" by the order and that the trustee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases