Hettinga has set forth no persuasive basis to disturb the motion court's dismissal of her claims without prejudice where the complaint intermingled plaintiffs' direct and derivative claims into single causes of action (Abrams v Donati,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HETTINGA v. NAHOUM
193 A.D.3d 449 (2021)
141 N.Y.S.3d 693
2021 NY Slip Op 02097
Wylmina Hettinga, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Alan T. Nahoum et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 6, 2021.
Decided April 6, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Wylmina Hettinga, appellant pro se.
Cole Schotz P.C., New York ( Krista L. Kulp of counsel), for respondents.
Concur—Renwick, J.P., Kennedy, Scarpulla, Shulman, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.