PICONE/WDF, JV v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Index No. 653642/18. Appeal No. 13503N. Case No. 2020-02463.

193 A.D.3d 433 (2021)

141 N.Y.S.3d 686

2021 NY Slip Op 02083

Picone/WDF, JV, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 1, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, New York ( Mark A. Rosen of counsel), for appellant.

James E. Johnson , Corporation Counsel, New York ( Daniel Matza-Brown of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, González, Shulman, JJ.


Defendant's motion to renew contained a reasonable justification for the failure to present the newly discovered documents on the prior motion (CPLR 2221[e][3]), namely, that, because of a miscommunication among three different offices, the search of the 860,000 digital documents pertaining to the project did not include all the documents underlying the issuance of the Certificate of Substantial Completion (CSC).

Upon renewal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases