The hearing court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress his statement to police. Miranda warnings were not required, because, to the extent the police briefly detained defendant for questioning in the lobby of his residence, this did not constitute custody for Miranda purposes (see Berkemer v McCarty,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.