PHH's cross motion to dismiss was unopposed, as plaintiffs admittedly failed to submit opposition, and the court denied their oral application to submit late papers. No appeal lies from an order entered on the default of an aggrieved party, and having defaulted on PHH's cross motion, their remedy is not an appeal but a motion to vacate (see Shannon v City of New York,
In any event...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.