CIT BANK N.A. v. SCHIFFMAN

No. 11.

36 N.Y.3d 550 (2021)

168 N.E.3d 1138

145 N.Y.S.3d 1

2021 NY Slip Op 01933

CIT BANK N.A., Respondent, v. PAMELA SCHIFFMAN et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided March 30, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Office of Samuel Katz, PLLC, Brooklyn ( Samuel Katz and Joseph J. Schwartz of counsel), for appellants.

Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C. ( Sean Marotta and Danielle Desaulniers Stempel of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), and New York City ( Allison J. Schoenthal and Allison M. Funk of counsel), for respondent.


OPINION OF THE COURT

In New York, prior to commencing a residential foreclosure action, a lender must comply with certain requirements set forth in the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law. As relevant here, these include, under section 1304, providing certain notices to the borrower 90 days before commencing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases