Defendant made a prima facie showing that she discharged plaintiff for cause after plaintiff settled her claim, allegedly without her authorization. Plaintiff merely raises an issue of fact as to defendant's credibility and motive. The fact that defendant's implied legal malpractice claim failed on causation or damages did not dispose of the issue of whether plaintiff was discharged for cause (e.g. Ulico Cas. Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SILBOWITZ, GARAFOLA, SILBOWITZ, SCHATZ & FREDERICK, LLP v. PARAVAS
192 A.D.3d 609 (2021)
2021 NY Slip Op 01871
Silbowitz, Garafola, Silbowitz, Schatz & Frederick, LLP, Respondent, v. Trisha Paravas, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 25, 2021.
Decided March 25, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Trisha Paravas, appellant pro se.
Silbowitz, Garafola, Silbowitz, Schatz & Frederick, LLP, Great Neck ( Howard Schatz of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Singh, González, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.