Petitioner's FOIL request for "the list of police officers of any rank or law enforcement agency indicating ... adverse credibility findings," "from January 1, 2017, to the present," was properly denied. The request asserted that the list was "maintained by" the New York County District Attorney's Office (DANY). However, in response to the request, DANY properly certified that it did not possess such a list (see Matter of Rattley v New York City Police Dept.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF STENGEL v. VANCE
Index No. 159740/18. Appeal No. 13411N. Case No. 2020-00989.
192 A.D.3d 571 (2021)
140 N.Y.S.3d 707
2021 NY Slip Op 01734
In the Matter of Andrew M. Stengel, Appellant, v. Cyrus Vance, Jr., et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 23, 2021.
Decided March 23, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Bell Law PLLC, New York ( Henry Bell of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. , District Attorney, New York ( Valerie Figueredo of counsel), for respondents.
Concur—Webber, J.P., Oing, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
