1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 192 A.D.3d
  5. 192 A.D.3d 457 (2021)
 

HARRIS v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Index No. 102620/06. Appeal No. 13301N. Case No. 2020-01182.

192 A.D.3d 457 (2021)

143 N.Y.S.3d 353

2021 NY Slip Op 01358

Stanton Harris, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. City of New York et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided March 9, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanton Harris, appellant pro se.

James E. Johnson , Corporation Counsel, New York ( Ellen Ravitch of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Gische, J.P., Singh, Moulton, González, JJ.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in finding that plaintiff has not proffered any reasonable excuse for the default (see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Navarro v A. Trenkman Estate, Inc., 279 A.D.2d 257, 258 [1st Dept 2001]). Plaintiff's contention that he did not appear for trial on January 28, 2019 because he made a calendaring error at the October 2018 pretrial conference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases