ORR v. YUN

603423/06. Appeal No. 13213. Case No. 2020-01101.

191 A.D.3d 610 (2021)

139 N.Y.S.3d 526

2021 NY Slip Op 01207

Kenneth E. Orr, Appellant, v. Daniel Yun et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 25, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth E. Orr, appellant pro se.

Heller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C., New York ( Martin Stein of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Singh, Mendez, JJ.


"The fact-finding determination of a court should not be disturbed on appeal unless its conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence, particularly where the findings of fact rest largely on the credibility of witnesses" (D.S. 53-16-F Assoc. v Groff Studios Corp., 168 A.D.3d 611, 611 [1st Dept 2019]).

Here, plaintiff provides no basis for rejecting the trial court's conclusion, based...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases