Defendants' motion for summary judgment was timely since it was filed within the time period provided in the preliminary conference order. That deadline is controlling, despite the transfer to another Justice with part rules shortening the time, given no subsequent order or directive explicitly providing otherwise (see Encore I, Inc. v Kabcenell,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
LOPEZ v. METROPOLITAN TR. AUTH.
191 A.D.3d 508 (2021)
138 N.Y.S.3d 327
2021 NY Slip Op 00910
Juan Lopez, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Transit Authority et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 11, 2021.
Decided February 11, 2021.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, LLP, Lake Success ( Jonathan P. Shaub of counsel), for appellants.
Hill & Moin LLP, New York ( Cheryl R. Eisberg Moin of counsel), for respondent.
Concur— Acosta, P.J., Kapnick, Singh, Mendez, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.