SECURITIZED ASSET FUNDING 2011-2, LTD. v. CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE

Index No. 653911/15. Appeal No. 13098N. Case No. 2020-01807.

191 A.D.3d 486 (2021)

138 N.Y.S.3d 309

2021 NY Slip Op 00815

Securitized Asset Funding 2011-2, Ltd., Appellant, v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Respondent/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Respondent. Securitized Asset Funding 2011-2, Ltd., et al., Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided February 9, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Selendy & Gay PLLC, New York ( Philippe Z. Selendy of counsel), for appellants.

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York ( Jay B. Kasner of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Gische, González, Shulman, JJ.


The court properly found that CIBC has not waived its attorney-client privilege concerning the material and testimony Cerberus seeks to compel by placing them at issue. CIBC has disavowed any intention to use privileged documents to prove the relevant defense or counterclaim and, as the motion court found, the invasion of the privilege is not necessary to determine their validity (see IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 107 A.D.3d 451...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases