The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that equitable estoppel prevented respondent from challenging his paternity of the children with DNA testing (see Family Ct Act § 532[a]). Clear and convincing evidence demonstrated that the 18-year-old children viewed respondent as their father for the entirety of their lives and respondent held himself out as such, particularly when the children were young (see Matter of Shondel J. v Mark...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.