KASS v. MACHLES

Index No. 302502/10. Appeal No. 12813. Case No. 2020-03006.

190 A.D.3d 459 (2021)

135 N.Y.S.3d 650

2021 NY Slip Op 00089

Walter Kass, Appellant, v. Cindy Machles, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided January 7, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kliegerman & Joseph LLP, New York ( Michael P. Joseph of counsel), for appellant.

Lee A. Rubenstein , New York, for respondent.

Concur—Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kapnick, Moulton, González, Shulman, JJ.


Defendant's motion seeking to hold plaintiff in contempt was not referred to the Referee (see CPLR 4212, 4311), and, accordingly, the Referee's finding on that issue was not a proper basis for the court's adjudication of contempt against plaintiff (see Westland Garden State Plaza, L.P. v EZAT, Inc., 39 A.D.3d 291, 292 [1st Dept 2007]). The court's subsequent nunc pro tunc order referring the contempt motion to the Referee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases