1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 190 A.D.3d
  5. 190 A.D.3d 431 (2021)
 

PEOPLE v. BURGOS

Ind. No. 3277/13. Appeal No. 12571. Case No. 2016-01584.

190 A.D.3d 431 (2021)

139 N.Y.S.3d 59

2021 NY Slip Op 00032

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angelo Burgos, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided January 5, 2021.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clayman & Rosenberg LLP, New York ( Wayne E. Gosnell, Jr. of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. , District Attorney, New York ( Sheila L. Bautista of counsel), for respondent.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Gische, Oing, González, Kennedy, JJ.

Defendant's legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Defendant's postverdict motions did not preserve this issue, or any of the other unpreserved issues raised on this appeal (see e.g. People v Padro, 75 N.Y.2d 820 [1990]; People v Bradford, 85 A.D.3d 664, 665 [1st Dept 2011], lv denied 17 N.Y.3d 857

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases