The motion court correctly concluded that the seventeenth affirmative defense pled in Kohler's answer, which states, "Where applicable, Kohler preserves its right to object to personal jurisdiction of [p]laintiff over Kohler," was insufficient to assert a personal jurisdiction defense "with specificity," thereby waiving it (Interlink Metals & Chems. v Kazdan,
In view of the foregoing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.