WANG v. LaFRIEDA

652225/16. Appeal No. 12739N. Case No. 2020-01859.

189 A.D.3d 732 (2020)

134 N.Y.S.3d 721

2020 NY Slip Op 08025

Gia Wang et al., Appellants, v. Patrick B. LaFrieda et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 29, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gia Wang, appellant pro se and for Gia Wang LLC, appellant.

Bronster LLP, New York ( Don Abraham of counsel), for Patrick B. LaFrieda and Patrick L. LaFrieda, respondents.

Cuti Hecker Wang LLP, New York ( John R. Cuti of counsel), for HADSW LLC, 601 Washington Street Holdings LLC and Charles Dunne, respondents.

Concur—Webber, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Moulton, González, JJ.


The IAS court providently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs' motion to renew (Sarmiento v Ampex Casting Corp., 171 A.D.3d 544 [1st Dept 2019]; CPLR 2221[e]). The new affidavit, submitted by plaintiff Gia Wang's former assistant Victoria Leetsi, was "merely cumulative of other information that had already been presented to the court," and thus insufficient to warrant renewal (Northern Assur. Co. of Am. v Holden, 179 A.D.2d 569

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases