The record supports the court's determination that petitioner's visitation with the child should be restricted to video visits and supervised and therapeutic sessions in a secure facility as necessary to protect the safety of the child and of respondent
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF EUSHAWN M. R. v. AYONNA B.
189 A.D.3d 709 (2020)
134 N.Y.S.3d 720
2020 NY Slip Op 08014
In the Matter of Eushawn M. R., Appellant v. Ayonna B., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 29, 2020.
Decided December 29, 2020.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Richard L. Herzfeld, P.C., New York ( Richard L. Herzfeld of counsel), for appellant.
Law Offices of Randall S. Carmel, Jericho ( Randall S. Carmel of counsel), for respondent.
Janet Neustaetter , The Children's Law Center, Brooklyn ( Rachel Stanton of counsel), attorney for the child.
Concur—Webber, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Moulton, González, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.