Plaintiffs' motion to renew with regard to the CEMA was properly granted, and the court's modification of its prior determination to one where defendants held only a 37.5% interest of that mortgage was correct. Defendants' reliance on oral promises to modify the terms of written assignments of mortgages
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PATMOS FIFTH REAL ESTATE, INC. v. MAZL BLDG., LLC
189 A.D.3d 632 (2020)
139 N.Y.S.3d 142
2020 NY Slip Op 07716
Patmos Fifth Real Estate, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Mazl Building, LLC, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. Mazl Building LLC et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. August Reitano, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 22, 2020.
Decided December 22, 2020.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Harfenist Kraut & Perlstein, LLP, Lake Success ( Steven J. Harfenist of counsel), for appellants.
Blank Rome LLP, New York ( Andrew T. Hambelton of counsel), and Blank Rome LLP, Pennsylvania, PA ( Daniel E. Rhynhart and Charles A. Fitzpatrick IV , of the bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for respondent.
Concur—Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Singh, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.