FRANCO v. HYATT CORP.

153152/14. Appeal No. 12422. Case No. 2019-3451.

189 A.D.3d 569 (2020)

137 N.Y.S.3d 34

2020 NY Slip Op 07522

Anthony Franco, Appellant, v. Hyatt Corporation, Doing Business as Hyatt Times Square, et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided December 15, 2020.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Law Office of Tamara M. Harris, New York ( Tamara Harris of counsel), for appellant.

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York ( Judy C. Selmeci of counsel), for respondents.

Concur—Gische, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moulton, González, JJ.


Defendants failed to establish that they were entitled to summary dismissal of plaintiff's quid pro quo sexual harassment and hostile work environment claims under either the State or the City Human Rights Laws. They also failed to show that they were entitled to summary dismissal of plaintiff's claim of retaliation.

The issue in a quid pro quo sexual harassment case brought under the State Human Rights Law is whether one or more employment decisions are linked to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases