Neither side identified evidence that would justify reversing the findings of the trial court as to the amounts or the existence of defendants' obligation under the promissory note or the offsets thereto.
The trial court correctly ruled that plaintiff was entitled to attorneys' fees for work relating to enforcement of the note only and not for work relating to the off-set defenses, which were not inextricably intertwined with enforcement of the note (see Matter...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
